
How Does It Compare
to Other Devices?
The three most common
devices on the market today address the airflow problem indirectly by
stretching the whole nostril, often uncomfortably.
One device attaches
to the outside of the nose with an adhesive and uses a spring to literally
pull the nose open by the skin. While effective, this method can be
uncomfortable, and may result in skin irritation. As a consequence of
this approach, many people develop a skin sensitivity and must discontinue
use.
Another
device also uses a spring which goes from nostril to nostril, stretching
them open with continuous pressure. This presents the drawbacks of uncomfortable
stretching of the nostrils as well as applying continuous pressure which
can in time potentially cause skin irritation.
The third
device is a small wire barrel which is placed within each nostril serving
as an internal dilator. Besides the inconvenience of being two separate
pieces, such internal dilation can be difficult to use, stretching each
whole nostril wide open. In addition, the insertion of such a device
would not be possible in persons with a significantly deviated septum.
In contrast,
the NoseWorks(TM) nasal support is a passive device which uses no springs
or annoying pressure. Consisting of thin, lightweight specially molded
plastic, this easy-to-use device effectively prevents the collapse of
the sides of the nose during exercise or sleep. As a result, you breathe
easier with increased oxygen intake and can sleep soundly with the prospect
no more snoring!
In the June 2004 issue of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, P.G. Michaelson and E.A. Mair, reported their results of a study they performed to evaluate 3 popular noninvasive treatments for snoring: an oral spray lubricant applied before bedtime, a nasal strip designed to maintain nasal valve patency, and a head-positioning pillow.
The study was designed as a randomized blinded clinical trial of 3 popular noninvasive snore aids using objective acoustic snoring analysis and subjective patient and bed-partner questionnaires in 40 snoring patients. A digital recorder allowed snoring analysis with data collected in the home environment over 1 week.
Studied snore remedies with proposed mechanisms of action and noted subjective complaints from patient questionnaire. *
| Treatment |
Proposed Mechanism |
Subjective Comments |
| Snorenz Oral Spray |
Lubricates palate |
- Bad taste
- Increased thirst
|
| Breathe Right Nasal Strips |
Increased size of nasal airway |
- Skin irritation
- Strips uncomfortable
- Hard to remove without additional discomfort
|
| Snore-No-More Pillow |
Reduce airway obstruction while preventing tongue from falling into airway |
- Uncomfortable
- Morning headache
- Morning neck stiffness
|
*Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, "Popular Snore Aids: Do They Work?" P.G. Michaelson and E.A. Mair, June 2004, Volume 130, Number 6, page 657 All included comments appeared on 2 or more separate questionnaires. |
|